![]() ![]() She could've found a better script on prime time and after this disaster of a film, she should really consider a career shift. Meera is abysmal and the rest of the actors with their grim voices are not worth mentioning.Īs for the daayan, her story is too flimsy. Clearly, the actor sleepwalks through his role and a good pay cheque seemed like his only impetus to see this through the end. And the visual of a flying Sharman ala Shaktiman, will have you in splits. Sharman Joshis 1920 London is like most of Bollywood horror movies: boring. ![]() There are corny dialogues that provide some comic relief. After her husband is possessed by an evil spirit, a woman turns to her former lover to perform an exorcism. It seems like the director forgot that even horror movies needs a storyline. Alas, no luck at that.ĭirector Tinu Suresh Desai redeems himself only because he gives us enough things to laugh about. From the first frame itself, you get a hint of how ridiculous this will turn out to be but you sit in the hope that probably there will at least be one good enough scene that will scare you. THIS Bollywood director has filed a defamation case against Kamaal R Khan - Read more 1920 London movie review: More funny than scary 1920 London movie. After her husband is possessed by an evil spirit, a woman turns to her former lover to perform an. But Vikram Bhatt prefers relying on these over-sold elements even in 2016. A haunted mansion, rocking chairs, creaky sounds, a damsel in distress, a possessed man, an exorcist are all extremely gimmicky.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |